By now, most of you must have come across the news that OpenAI...
OpenAI and Google have recently approached the Trump Administration in the US, requesting "more access to government-held or government-supported data." This request comes as part of their public submissions, which you can read here.
The core of their argument lies in DeepSeek's perceived advantages in regulatory arbitrage due to its status as a Chinese entity, a claim which has been deemed misleading by OpenAI. Despite having significant resources, OpenAI's integrity has been questioned, with even Microsoft expressing skepticism towards them.
AI and Legal Frameworks
Across the globe, there has been a surge in the development of AI and law frameworks driven by concerns and uncertainties. In an effort to navigate India's regulatory and legal landscape, I crafted the country's first privately proposed bill, which can be found here. The process of drafting multiple versions of this bill based on valuable feedback led me to ponder on the administrative law regulations adopted by the Chinese, as eloquently discussed by Raymond Sun.
One of the intriguing aspects that emerged from these discussions was the lack of standardisation in consumer liability frameworks concerning preview-based AI applications. I had a fascinating conversation about this topic with Saiyam Pathak for Kubesimplify's YouTube Channel. You can watch the discussion here.
Final Thoughts
On a different note, the recent recommendations to Trump by Altman, along with his peculiar statement about his child not being able to surpass AI, raise interesting questions. What are your thoughts on this matter?
Feel free to engage with Bahadur Shah, Bogdan Grigorescu, Sanjay Notani, Akash Manwani, Mridutpal Bhattacharyya, Bhavana J, Anindita Biswas, and Pranab Ghosh in this stimulating discourse.
