Why on earth do we prevent the use of child images in an...
Hello, I’m from S.Korea. Recently, ChatGPT DALLE-3 blocked the creation of all photorealistic images of children for any reason, from an ethical point of view. But from an ethical point of view, it’s inflexible and inflexible. However, in a safe atmosphere such as art, family, fairy tales, and school life, I would like to be flexible and flexible. I’m concerned that this atmosphere is too rigid and too strict for ethical reasons.
GPT-4 Legacy is possible, but the problem is that if you try to create such children’s photos only in the 4o model, they will be blocked without flexibility, regardless of reasons such as family fairy tales. I am concerned that in the future, when creating children’s photos, we will have to use only unrealistic characters and illustrations, regardless of the reason, such as family illustrations, but I am worried about the lack of flexibility.
The Challenges Ahead
We are in the first stages of this revolution, and because of this, we need to face some handicaps. The first is, without a doubt, the system’s self-restrictions, which were created to prevent the violation of any governmental rules. The second will be the concrete rules created by the government to limit the scope of this new technology. The third is our consciousness. We don’t want to kill or hurt anyone. Fourth, the EU authorities’ stupidity in legislating for the possible faults that this technology will probably allow in the future. In the middle of all this are the programmers who need to solve problems and were found in the IA, the best method. But we don’t need to be concerned about this. We only need to be concerned with developing new things without violating any legal rules. In this way, it is better that the proper tool limits what we can do.
With time, we will probably have a version with fewer limitations, but with the resulting products signed to allow the trace to his origin. This allows the owner of the IA to be discharged of responsibility for the products because the creator is easily identified in case of a law violation. With a higher subscription price, of course. That’s my opinion, and if you argue a new one and convince me, I can change it.
Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled
