Scarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They ...
OpenAI recently found themselves in a controversy when Scarlett Johansson denied them the right to use her voice for their ChatGPT model. Despite her refusal, OpenAI proceeded to use a voice that closely resembled hers, sparking a heated debate on intellectual property rights and the boundaries of AI technology.
The Issue at Hand
OpenAI claimed to have employed a voice actor to produce the voice used in their model, raising questions about the legality and ethics of the situation. While there may not have been a direct copyright violation, there are concerns regarding rights of publicity and unauthorized use of likeness.
The Legal Landscape
Intellectual property laws can be complex, especially in cases involving AI technology and celebrity voices. OpenAI's actions, despite seeking permission from Johansson, have raised eyebrows due to the uncanny resemblance of the voice used in the ChatGPT model to the actress's voice.
A Question of Ethics
It is essential to consider the ethical implications of using someone's likeness or voice without their consent, even if legal lines are not explicitly crossed. The public scrutiny on OpenAI highlights the need for clear regulations and guidelines in the rapidly evolving field of AI.
It remains to be seen how this incident will impact future developments in AI technology and the protection of individual rights in the digital age.
Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled
