Mark Cuban asked ChatGPT who should be president after first Presidential Debate
President Joe Biden recently appeared on ABC for his first TV interview since the presidential debate in Atlanta, Georgia. During the interview, he discussed various aspects of his performance in the debate.
Billionaire investor and "Shark Tank" star Mark Cuban took an intriguing approach by consulting ChatGPT to analyze the debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Cuban sought an unbiased AI perspective on the candidates and who the bot would choose as the leader of the free world.
Cuban shared his experiment on Twitter, stating, "I cut and pasted a transcript of the debate into ChatGPT and asked it who it would hire for a job." He further explained that evaluating Biden and Trump for a hypothetical employment scenario involves assessing their communication skills, clarity, problem-solving abilities, and overall professionalism.
ChatGPT's Assessment
According to ChatGPT, Biden was acknowledged for his extensive experience in public service, along with his empathy and social awareness. However, the AI also highlighted that Biden's responses were occasionally unclear and disjointed, which could impact his communication effectiveness.
On the other hand, Trump was recognized for his assertiveness and confidence, traits associated with strong leadership qualities. Despite this, the AI pointed out that Trump tended to exaggerate his achievements and evade specific questions, raising concerns about his reliability and communication accuracy.
Following the analysis of the debate performance, ChatGPT concluded that neither candidate would be suitable for hiring. The AI suggested that further evaluation of Biden and Trump's professional capabilities and job fit would be necessary.
ChatGPT emphasized that Biden's empathy and experience hold value, but his communication challenges during the debate could pose problems in conveying his points effectively. Meanwhile, Trump's confidence and focus on economics were viewed positively, but his tendency to exaggerate and avoid specifics raised red flags regarding his reliability and precision.
