Unraveling Meta's AI Impact on Copyrighted Works

Meta's AI Model Leaves Judge Twisting Over Market 'Obliteration'

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people, and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news, and insight around the world.

Americas+1 212 318 2000 EMEA+44 20 7330 7500 Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000

Meta Platform Inc.'s generative AI model might theoretically obliterate the markets for copyrighted work, a federal judge said, but evidence is thin that the tech giant could have that effect on the works of authors including Sarah Silverman.

“I’ve twisted myself into a pretzel,” Judge Vince Chhabria told a packed courtroom in downtown San Francisco during a nearly three-hour hearing Thursday.

Judge's Decision

The judge is tasked with determining whether Meta’s decision to download millions of copyrighted books from notorious digital piracy websites to train its generative AI model Llama falls under the law’s fair use defense. He’ll likely be the first to have a say in how broadly courts will interpret the concept of market "obliteration" in the context of AI-generated content.

As the judge navigates through the arguments presented, it sets a precedent for future cases involving AI technologies and intellectual property rights.

Legal Implications

This case brings to light the complex legal implications surrounding the use of AI in generating content, especially when it comes to copyrighted material. Meta's AI model has sparked a debate on the potential impact it may have on existing markets for creative work.

Stay informed with AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools, and premium legal & business news. Log in to keep reading or access research tools.