The Cognitive Impact of ChatGPT on Learners

Published On Sat Dec 14 2024
The Cognitive Impact of ChatGPT on Learners

ChatGPT and the separation between knowledge and knower ...

ChatGPT is now widely recognized in academia and the media as a revolutionary tool in education. While some critics raise concerns about its impact on ethical educational practices and critical thinking skills, supporters believe it enhances education by offering a more personalized learning experience. Current discussions on the ethical implications of using ChatGPT in education often focus on privacy, plagiarism, information accuracy, and trust in AI, overlooking fundamental philosophies of education.

Challenging the prevailing views on ethics and the interaction between learners and technology, this paper emphasizes the significance of a humanistic approach to written composition and education as a whole. It argues that ChatGPT could potentially limit the cognitive, intellectual, and ethical development of learners, possibly transforming them into passive knowledge consumers rather than active knowledge producers.

What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education?

References:

  • Al-Amoudi, I. (2022). Are post-human technologies dehumanizing? Human enhancement and artificial intelligence in contemporary societies. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(5), 516–538. Article
  • AI HLEG (2018). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://ec.europa.eu/
  • Allen, J. (1996). Post-industrialism/post-Fordism. In S. Hall, D. Held, D. Hubert, & K. Thompson (Eds.), Modernity: An introduction to modern societies (pp. 533–563). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Anderson, V. (2010). Supply-side dreams: Composition, technology, and the circular logic of class. Computers and Composition, 27(2), 124–137. Article
  • Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. Book
  • Archer, M. S. (2021). Sapience and sentience: A reply to Porpora. In M. S. Archer, & A. Maccarini (Eds.), What is essential to being human? Can A.I. robots not share it? (pp. 40–55). Routledge. Chapter
  • Archer, M. S., & Tritter, J. Q. (2000). Introduction. In M. S. Archer, & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Taylor & Francis.
  • Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. Routledge. Book
  • Bouchard, J. (2021). Complexity, emergence, and causality in applied linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan. Book