California can't prohibit guns in hospitals and medical facilities, court rules
A federal appeals court has ruled that California cannot prohibit firearms at hospitals and other healthcare locations, despite the state's ability to ban guns in many public places.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, based in San Francisco, issued the ruling on Friday following an injunction that blocked a California law banning firearms in most public places.
Court's Decision
The court upheld the injunction, stating that it is unlikely for California to regulate firearms in hospitals and medical facilities. The ruling mentioned that there is a lack of a national historical tradition of banning firearms in medical settings.
While the state cannot establish a precedent for restricting guns in hospitals, individual operators have the freedom to implement their own firearm policies.
California's Response
California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed gratitude for the ruling, emphasizing the state's commitment to limiting guns in public areas.
Although the court's decision allows California to enforce restrictions in various places, it also acknowledges the right of medical facility operators to prohibit firearms based on property laws.
Newsom remarked, “California will continue to take action to protect our residents and defend our nation-leading, life-saving gun laws.”
Implications for Other States
The ruling also highlighted Hawaii's authority to ban firearms in specific locations such as bars, restaurants serving alcohol, and beaches.
The California Rifle & Pistol Association, one of the plaintiffs in the case, expressed some satisfaction with the outcome.
The organization stated that it is assessing further steps, including advocacy efforts to uphold their position.
