I Tested ChatGPT's Seafood Knowledge. Here's What I Found...
As AI technology continues to develop, there is a growing concern about its impact on various industries and potential job loss. However, for the seafood industry, aquaculture, in particular, has promised several benefits such as efficiency, precision, quality improvements, worker safety, and a reduction in environmental impact.
But the biggest concern for seafood in the AI era is whether AI chat algorithms can provide accurate information and sort it in a way that would not perpetuate common misconceptions. To put this to the test, I used the widely acclaimed ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) to test its ability to provide accurate and concise information about the complex seafood industry.
Despite my initial skepticism, ChatGPT impressed me with its knowledge of complex topics such as antibiotics, sea lice, overfishing, and labor abuse that often make the news. However, it does tend to give both sides of an issue, which can lead people to be less confident about the information provided, especially when the science is advanced, or the facts don't add up.
It was interesting to note that ChatGPT's descriptions of seafood, such as salmon, ended on a note that could lead consumers to believe they should not be eating the fish they are asking about at all. On the other hand, beef ranching and poultry farming were given a much softer touch, and pork farming received a complete pass, with no negative language at all.
When asked what seafood to eat, ChatGPT recommended purchasing seafood certified by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP), or Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification. While these organizations are legitimate and respected, it is important to note that consumers should not be confused into thinking all fish without those logos are not sustainable.
Although ChatGPT's ability to interact on a human level is impressive, there is always a risk of bias. Its learning ability, including from search entries, can open up the algorithm to manipulation, making it imperative to verify the information.
In conclusion, ChatGPT has the ability to provide simple, direct answers to complex seafood-related questions, making it easier for consumers to make informed decisions. However, the relationship that develops between users and ChatGPT needs to be taken with caution, as it can deepen trust in the information provided, which may not always be unbiased or backed by science.
