ChatGPT vs Gemini — here's the winning chatbot that helped me...
Planning a trip to Walt Disney World for a family of five can feel overwhelming. That's why I decided to test AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini to see which one could help me plan the perfect vacation.
Testing the Chatbots
As a former Walt Disney World cast member, I have insider knowledge of the parks. However, I still wanted to see how ChatGPT and Gemini would fare in planning a Disney vacation for my family. I tested them with 7 key prompts to determine which chatbot could deliver the ultimate vacation experience.
Prompt 1: Planning Accommodation and Tickets
ChatGPT: Provided insights on the best times to visit, recommended Disney Resorts, and suggested money-saving tips for tickets.
Gemini: Offered detailed advice on budget-friendly hotels, discounts, and highlighted Disney events, winning in the money-saving advice category.
Winner: Gemini for best money-saving tips.
Prompt 2: First Day Itinerary
ChatGPT: Suggested activities at Disney Springs and hotel swimming, catering to a budget-conscious approach.
Gemini: Recommended Disney Springs and EPCOT, but lacked comprehensive cost-saving advice and alternatives, making it less budget-friendly.
Winner: ChatGPT for its practical and budget-conscious suggestions.
Prompt 3: 5-Day Itinerary
ChatGPT: Crafted a detailed day-by-day itinerary, balancing must-see rides and dining experiences, providing realistic timing for park navigation.
Gemini: Offered a great itinerary but lacked alternative suggestions for weather considerations, missing out on a comprehensive approach.
Winner: ChatGPT for its holistic consideration of needs and time management.
Prompt 4: Dining Experiences
ChatGPT: Suggested character meals like Chef Mickey’s and tips on booking reservations, as well as other memorable dining options.
Gemini: Mentioned dining options but lacked key tips for securing reservations, making it less comprehensive in this aspect.
Winner: ChatGPT for its detailed dining suggestions and reservation tips.
