Why ABC settled a case they knew they would win — and why the ...
ABC found themselves in hot water when a journalist accurately described Donald J. Trump as a convicted rapist during a broadcast. Despite the fact that Trump's actions aligned with the legal definition of rape, ABC decided to settle the case instead of taking it to court. Legal experts were confident that ABC would have easily won the case if it went to trial.
Instead of facing a legal battle, ABC opted to pay a fine of $15 million to Trump. This decision was likely influenced by corporate considerations, as ABC is owned by Disney. By choosing to settle, ABC aimed to maintain a positive relationship with Trump, albeit at the cost of a relatively small fine.
The Influence of Corporate Giants
The capitulation of ABC reflects a broader trend among corporate-owned media outlets. Other prominent figures, such as Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Washington Post's Jeff Bezos, and Time magazine's Mark Benioff, have also caved to pressure from Trump.
The REAL Deep State: How Corporations Control Government | George Magazine
These CEOs prioritized their corporate interests over upholding the principles of free speech and democracy. By bowing down to Trump, they set a dangerous precedent that threatens the freedom of the press and the ability of the media to hold those in power accountable.
The Perils of Corporate Interests
Each of these corporate tycoons has ties to other businesses that may have influenced their decisions. Whether it's Jeff Bezos' involvement with Amazon and Blue Origin, Patrick Soon-Shiong's connections to for-profit healthcare through NantWorks, or Mark Benioff's lucrative contracts with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol through Salesforce, these CEOs have allowed their other corporate interests to overshadow the importance of a free press.
EFF to Court: Social Media Users Have Privacy and Free Speech ...
By prioritizing profit over principles, these CEOs have paved the way for Trump to silence his critics in the media. Their actions serve as a stark reminder of the dangers of for-profit legacy media and the potential consequences of compromising on free speech.
History has shown us the dangers of allowing corporate interests to dictate political decisions. Just as some of Germany's corporate elites underestimated Hitler's influence and ultimately paid the price, today's corporate giants must be wary of the power they wield and the impact of their decisions on society.
ABC's settlement with Trump is just one example of how corporate interests can shape the media landscape and undermine the principles of democracy and free speech. It's a sobering reminder of the importance of standing up for these values, even in the face of corporate pressure.
First, Elon Musk made us pay for 'free speech'. Now he decides ...
As we navigate a media landscape dominated by corporate giants, it's crucial to remain vigilant and uphold the principles of a free and independent press. The actions of ABC and other media outlets serve as a cautionary tale of what happens when profit trumps principles.
Ultimately, the decision to settle with Trump may have been a strategic move for ABC, but it raises important questions about the influence of corporate interests on the media and the need to protect the freedom of the press at all costs.
Let us learn from history and ensure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated in our modern times.
References:
