Writers Have Every Right to Be Furious About AI-Detection | by ...
As a publication editor, I am royally upset. My fellow editors and I dedicate a significant amount of time to reviewing stories. While some are clearly AI-generated, others skillfully straddle the line, casting doubts but not providing enough clues to give them away.
As a writer, I am appalled. I have poured nothing but genuine human effort into every story I have ever shared. This process also requires time. It is disheartening to see opportunists and con artists simply feed a prompt into ChatGPT and pass off the outcomes as their own work.
As a reader, I am disheartened. Instead of bringing about a better online environment, the rise of AI-generated content has made exploring new authors feel like navigating a minefield. Is that brilliant sentence I just read truly a product of a human mind, or is it merely a patchwork of other writers' words that were plagiarized?
I am frustrated by reports stating that OpenAI has developed a dependable method of watermarking text produced by ChatGPT. This watermark is invisible to users but has a 99.9% accuracy rate in identifying such content.
Mechanic of the human soul. I channel Seneca and Machiavelli at unpredictable intervals.
