'Writing is thinking': do students who use ChatGPT learn less? | News
Recent research has sparked a debate among educators over the impact of using AI tools like ChatGPT for essay writing. A viral study suggested that students who rely on ChatGPT may exhibit reduced critical thinking skills.
The Study
Jocelyn Leitzinger, a professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, observed a trend in her students' essays. Many students using ChatGPT tended to default to common narratives, raising concerns about the originality of their work. This observation led to further investigation.
In a study by MIT researchers, adult students were divided into three groups. One group used ChatGPT, another used a search engine, and the third group solely relied on their own cognitive abilities to write essays. The results showed that the ChatGPT users scored lower in critical thinking metrics compared to the brain-only group.
Educators' Concerns
Teachers noted that essays generated with ChatGPT lacked creativity and depth despite having strong grammar and structure. The ease of copy-pasting content led to concerns about the authenticity and insight in student work.
While some argue that AI tools like ChatGPT can enhance productivity, others, including neuroscientists like Ashley Juavinett, caution against overreliance. Juavinett emphasized the need for more rigorous research before drawing definitive conclusions about the cognitive effects of using large language models.
Implications for Learning
Leitzinger and other educators worry that the convenience of AI tools may overshadow the importance of genuine learning experiences. Students may miss essential steps in the learning process by bypassing critical thinking and deep engagement with course material.
Despite the potential benefits of AI in academia, there are growing concerns about its impact on writing quality and intellectual development. The influx of AI-generated content in academic and publishing spheres raises questions about the future of creativity and critical thinking.
As Leitzinger aptly puts it, "Writing is thinking, thinking is writing, and when we eliminate that process, what does that mean for thinking?"
Originally published on doc.afp.com, part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange.
